Mention access control fix in bugs.html

Martin von Loewis
Sat Mar 4 02:12:00 GMT 2000

I just put the patch below into bugs.html.


Index: bugs.html
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 bugs.html
--- bugs.html	2000/02/15 23:54:02	1.12
+++ bugs.html	2000/03/04 10:10:53
@@ -133,10 +133,13 @@
 X::Y z;
-Since <CODE>Y</CODE> is a private member of <CODE>X</CODE>, the
+<p>Since <CODE>Y</CODE> is a private member of <CODE>X</CODE>, the
 definition of <CODE>z</CODE> should be rejected, but isn't. This
 applies to structs, classes and types in general; for other members of
-classes (functions and data), access control is implemented.
+classes (functions and data), access control is implemented.</p>
+<p>In the development branch of gcc, this bug was fixed on Feb 7, 2000.
+The fix will appear in the next major release of gcc (after 2.95).</p>
 <h3><a name="export"></a>export not implemented</h3>

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list