Your sizetype changes ...
Wed Mar 1 12:22:00 GMT 2000
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Kenner <email@example.com> writes:
Richard> They are considered equivalent. So, when we ask to
Richard> convert an expression with type `unsigned int' to
Richard> `size_t', we don't do anything -- we just leave the
Richard> expression alone. So, then, when we pass it to
Richard> size_binop, it aborts.
Richard> Ah, I see. So the test case you sent me blows up?
Richard> We went through that: sizes are not *updated*, they are
Richard> *set once*.
I'm not going to argue about this again. All I'm clarifying is that I
didn't say anything about what we passed to size_binop, which is the
point at which you added assertions. You implied that those
assertions were somehow inspired our discussion; I was saying that I
didn't see the connection.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc-patches