[PATCH] - Fix bogus dependency in Makefile.in

[Zack Weinberg]

On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:21:00AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 06:08:36PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > I'll add that in my ideal world there would be no C++ code in libgcc.
> > The other languages don't put their internal runtime routines in
> > libgcc; why should C++ do so?
> 
> History.  And we've come to no agreement on where they should
> go instead.  The obvious choice of libstdc++ was rejected because
> the routines in libgcc implement the core C++ language, and are
> not related to the standard library.

That didn't stop Fortran, Chill, or Objective C from using their
standard library to implement the core primitives.  Or C, come to
think of it.

zw