malloc-based ggc-page

[Richard Henderson]

On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 12:02:33PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Then, I would still suggest that you implement valloc in libiberty.

I'd suggest putting gnu malloc in there.  No sense futzing
about with an inferior malloc/valloc combination when we
can just replace both.

Any system that can't support _that_ can just use ggc-simple.
Although I don't know how to tell if gnu malloc won't work...


r~