Need a global GCC maintainer ruling on atexit

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Dec 30, 2000, msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov) wrote:

> What I meant by 1 was providing actual atexit in libiberty, not just xatexit,
> replacing the system's exit using the knowledge of how it's implemented, just
> like libgcc2 does right now.

Do you have any reason to believe replacing exit() can be done
portably?  Besides, one of the principles behind libiberty is that it
doesn't *replace* existing functionality, because there are systems on
which you get in trouble if you attempt to replace functions from
libc.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me