[G]CSE of extended asm statements

Bernd Schmidt bernds@cygnus.co.uk
Wed Aug 30 00:28:00 GMT 2000

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Actually, the best way to represent this is with
>   (set (parallel [(out1) (out2) (out3)])
>        (asm_operand ...))

I strongly dislike that.  We have an existing way to describe
parallel sets, and I don't see a benefit in adding another one.
I have a feeling that allowing the above will create a whole new
set of bugs because most likely there are several dozen places
in the compiler that would not be able to handle this construct.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list