C++: Prune unused declarations (revised)
Zack Weinberg
zack@wolery.cumb.org
Tue Aug 29 14:10:00 GMT 2000
This is a revised patch which uses the walk_tree helper routine, and
is therefore much shorter. There are still some awkwardnesses.
prune_unused_decls has to walk BLOCK_VARS itself and has to jump a
couple of hoops in order to avoid confusing walk_tree with its
modifications. Also, walk_tree dinks with the current line number, so
it has to be saved and restored.
walk_tree lives in the C++ front end, it should probably be moved out
to c-common.c or even tree.c. Till then, the code goes in
cp/semantics.c - unlike the previous patch.
Bootstrapped i386-linux, no C++ regressions.
zw
* cp/semantics.c (prune_unused_decls): New function.
(finish_stmt_tree): Call it via walk_tree.
===================================================================
Index: cp/semantics.c
--- cp/semantics.c 2000/08/18 09:31:11 1.164
+++ cp/semantics.c 2000/08/29 21:08:26
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
static tree maybe_convert_cond PARAMS ((tree));
static tree simplify_aggr_init_exprs_r PARAMS ((tree *, int *, void *));
+static tree prune_unused_decls PARAMS ((tree *, int *, void *));
static void deferred_type_access_control PARAMS ((void));
static void emit_associated_thunks PARAMS ((tree));
@@ -2241,6 +2242,57 @@ finish_typeof (expr)
return TREE_TYPE (expr);
}
+/* Remove declarations of internal variables that are not used from a
+ stmt tree. To qualify, the variable must have a name and must have
+ a zero DECL_SOURCE_LINE. We tried to remove all variables for
+ which TREE_USED was false, but it turns out that there's tons of
+ variables for which TREE_USED is false but that are still in fact
+ used. */
+
+static tree
+prune_unused_decls (tp, walk_subtrees, data)
+ tree *tp;
+ int *walk_subtrees ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED;
+ void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED;
+{
+ tree t = *tp;
+
+ if (t == NULL_TREE)
+ {
+ *walk_subtrees = 0;
+ return NULL_TREE;
+ }
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == DECL_STMT)
+ {
+ tree d = DECL_STMT_DECL (t);
+ if (!TREE_USED (d) && DECL_NAME (d) && DECL_SOURCE_LINE (d) == 0)
+ {
+ *tp = TREE_CHAIN (t);
+ /* Recurse on the new value of tp, otherwise we will skip
+ the next statement. */
+ return prune_unused_decls (tp, walk_subtrees, data);
+ }
+ }
+ else if (TREE_CODE (t) == BLOCK)
+ {
+ /* walk_tree doesn't inspect BLOCK_VARS, so we must do it by hand. */
+ tree *vp;
+
+ for (vp = &BLOCK_VARS (t); *vp; )
+ {
+ tree v = *vp;
+ if (! TREE_USED (v) && DECL_NAME (v) && DECL_SOURCE_LINE (v) == 0)
+ *vp = TREE_CHAIN (v); /* drop */
+ else
+ vp = &TREE_CHAIN (v); /* advance */
+ }
+ if (BLOCK_VARS (t) == NULL_TREE)
+ TREE_USED (t) = 0;
+ }
+ return NULL_TREE;
+}
+
/* Create an empty statement tree rooted at T. */
void
@@ -2262,11 +2314,18 @@ finish_stmt_tree (t)
tree *t;
{
tree stmt;
+ int old_lineno;
/* Remove the fake extra statement added in begin_stmt_tree. */
stmt = TREE_CHAIN (*t);
*t = stmt;
SET_LAST_STMT (NULL_TREE);
+
+ /* Remove unused decls from the stmt tree. walk_tree messes with
+ the line number, so save/restore it. */
+ old_lineno = lineno;
+ walk_tree (t, prune_unused_decls, 0);
+ lineno = old_lineno;
if (cfun)
{
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list