gcc/dependence.c problem on HP-UX 10.20

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008232110470.21970-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.
ac.uk>you write:
  > On 23 Aug 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
  > 
  > > > Line 199 of gcc/dependence.c:
  > > > static void ziv_test PARAMS ((subscript[], subscript[],
  > > >   enum direction_type[][], int[][], loop*, int));
  > > 
  > > Yep, this is bogus.  Please try this patch.  I've only tested it with
  > > GCC, so I'd appreciate it if you could run it through the compiler
  > > that (correctly) rejects the code and let me know if the patch fixes
  > > all instances of the problem.
  > 
  > OK to commit the following testcase for GCC's failure to diagnose the
  > problem?  (Tree checking errors for the array of functions will cause an
  > XPASS and a FAIL.  I'll submit a PR.  Though - see the referenced DR -
  > diagnostics are only needed in C99, the behavior is undefined anyway and
  > it would in fact make little sense for the diagnostics to depend on the
  > standard version.)
  > 
  > 2000-08-23  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
  > 
  > 	* gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c: New test.
Approved.

jeff