Fwd: ["BUG: -funroll-all-loops generates unresolved externals"]

[Manfred Hollstein]

On Thursday, 17 August 2000, 17:03:44 -0600, law@cygnus.com wrote:

> 
>   In message < 14746.54741.891463.371824@saturn.hollstein.net >you write:
>    > So, unless I misunderstood the gcc.c-torture framework, we would have
>   > to add another set of flags to TORTURE_OPTIONS with -funroll-all-loops
>   > included and -finline-functions excluded, and put the testcase into
>   > gcc.c-torture/execute. I'm not against it, but I believe that would be
>   > overkill.
> Can you simply order the functions so that the definition of the function
> always comes after its use?
> 
> That prevents our inliner from doing anything.

Of course... Reordered appropriately, patch attached. OK to install?

Cheers.

l8er
manfred

> 
> jeff