"no regressions" meaning?
Tue Aug 8 01:03:00 GMT 2000
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Larry Evans wrote:
> 4. There are "no regressions" iff there are no differences shown in
> step 3.2
There are no regressions iff the failures in the second testrun are
a (non-proper) subset of the failures in the first testrun.
You might have fixed a bug by means of your change! ;-)
Gerald "Jerry" firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
More information about the Gcc-patches