"no regressions" meaning?

Gerald Pfeifer pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Tue Aug 8 01:03:00 GMT 2000

On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Larry Evans wrote:
>    4.  There are "no regressions" iff there are no differences shown in
> step 3.2

There are no regressions iff the failures in the second testrun are
a (non-proper) subset of the failures in the first testrun.

You might have fixed a bug by means of your change! ;-)

Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list