Fri Apr 28 02:37:00 GMT 2000
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 05:58:26PM +0100, graham wrote:
> > I added a similar patch to my local tree to get the
> > bootstrap passed this abort. The only difference was
> > my patch checked for (!= REG) rather than (== MEM)
> > because the following code only works for a REG.
> A fine distinction, but if we ever find anything but REG or MEM
> in there something's gone very wrong.
Yes, thats was why I've done it only for MEMs (I was interested
what else triggers.)
Also I apologize for the accidental checkin.
More information about the Gcc-patches