mn10300/AM33: missing ASHIFT, AND and LABEL_REF in address_cost function

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < or66t3bntp.fsf@zecarneiro.lsd.ic.unicamp.br >you write:
  > On Apr 27, 2000, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote:
  > 
  > > I am just bootrapping patch that will change the behaviour and call
  > > ADDRESS_COST only for rtls passing address_operand check.  I believe
  > > this will avoid the codes you are seeing right now.
  > 
  > At least the LABEL_REF would probably still be needed.  The others
  > could definitely go away.  But it doesn't hurt to keep them :-)
Well, they add complexity where it isn't needed.  4 years from now someone
looks at that code and says "WTF are AND/ASHIFT cases doing here!" :-)


jeff