Thu Apr 27 10:09:00 GMT 2000
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 05:58:26PM +0100, graham wrote:
> I added a similar patch to my local tree to get the
> bootstrap passed this abort. The only difference was
> my patch checked for (!= REG) rather than (== MEM)
> because the following code only works for a REG.
A fine distinction, but if we ever find anything but REG or MEM
in there something's gone very wrong.
More information about the Gcc-patches