mn10300/AM33: missing ASHIFT, AND and LABEL_REF in address_cost function
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@cygnus.com
Thu Apr 27 06:29:00 GMT 2000
On Apr 26, 2000, Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> wrote:
>> * config/mn10300/mn10300.c (mn10300_address_cost): Test
>> ASHIFT, AND and LABEL_REF.
> Fine. Presumably it does not have a negative impact on code size, right?
No code size changse.
> Actually, I'm rather surprised that ASHIFT/AND show up in address
> calculations on the mn103.
So was I. It only showed up with high optimization levels, and
obviously never made it to final RTL. But, if they weren't handled,
we'd abort ().
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list