Real purpose for failure in "Too restrictive sanity check"
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Sun Apr 23 13:42:00 GMT 2000
In message < 39017AD6.4C52906@rcp.co.uk >you write:
> Jan
>
> With your modified patch which handles zero-length
> sequences applied the stage1 compiler miscompiles
> genattrtab.c on x86-linux when bootstraping with
> -funroll-loops.
>
> Here's a testcase derived from the expand_units()
> routine in genattrtab.c
[ ... ]
I added this to the testsuite.
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list