Patch to fix emit_library_call_value_1 for const functions

[Richard Henderson]

On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 03:02:27PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I only wanted to keep code in sync with expand_call. We use sequence
> for malloc calls there to make them removable ...

I can't remove malloc calls.  We did it, I thought, to track
that the return value doesn't alias anything.

> Oops! I see, I've replaced wrong arg. Silly.
> I wonder why this didn't show up in the regression tests.

Cause x86 doesn't use this value.  You'd have had to try ppc or arm.

> 	(expand_call): Do not reverze args in "equal from" field.
> 	(emit_library_call_value_1): Emit_libcall_block for const and pure
> 	function.

Ok.



r~