New testcase (compare2.c) for bogus -Wsign-compare warnings

[Kaveh R. Ghazi]

 > From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@cygnus.com>
 >  
 > On Apr  6, 2000, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
 >  
 > > But I'm hoping a testcase might inspire someone. :-)
 >  
 > :-)
 >  
 > Since there's no immediate fix in the foreseeable future, it might be
 > nice to mark the failing cases as `xfail's, so that others don't think
 > it's a regression.

Then it wouldn't be very "inspiring" now would it? :-)
BTW, new testcases are not regressions, IMHO.


 >   That's the policy for C++, but not for C, so maybe
 > it doesn't apply here.  But then, it's not like it's a high-priority
 > bug...

Well, any time a warning flag generates tons of spurious messages, it
becomes ignored/useless.  I'm trying to avoid that.


Actually, I think I can get the ?: ones without too much trouble.
Stay tuned...

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Internet Solutions