non-static definition after static declaration

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 199911290342.WAA28851@caip.rutgers.edu >you write:
  >  > From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
  >  > 
  >  >  > From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
  >  >  > 
  >  >  >   In message < 199911261022.LAA22961@mail.macqel.be >you write:
  >  >  >   > Fix :
  >  >  >   > As we want to be able to bootstrap gcc with old compilers, I thin
  > k we
  >  >  >   > should add `-Wtraditional' in WARN_CFLAGS.
  >  >  > I agree, even over Kaveh's objections.  Fixing these kinds of problem
  > s is
  >  >  > always incredibly annoying.  Now if I could convince the binutils pro
  > ject
  >  >  > to do the same thing :-)
  >  > 
  >  > My specific conclusion was that this flag should only be applied
  >  > against the top level gcc dir, I didn't object to the flag entirely.
  >  > 
  >  > I guess I'll hack something up. :-)
  >  > 		--Kaveh
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > And here it is.  Okay to install?
IMHO, it's not worth the extra hair in the Makefile.  The Makefile is
already far more complex than I would like.

jeff