Virtual destructor failed call on gcc 2.95.2

[Mark Mitchell]

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> writes:

    Alexandre> Sure, I'll do it.  BTW, I've just noticed that
    Alexandre> build_vec_delete{,_1} are always called with the same
    Alexandre> value for AUTO_DELETE (originally, integer_zero_node,
    Alexandre> now integer_two_node), so I though we could do some
    Alexandre> manual constant folding and dead code elimination, and
    Alexandre> remove the needless argument from these functions.  Is
    Alexandre> this something reasonable to do, in your opinion, or
    Alexandre> would you rather leave the useless code in the compiler
    Alexandre> just in case it becomes useful in the future?

I, like you, can't see what it would be good for.  So, please install
your second patch.  Thanks!

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com