i386 fabs/fchs patch
Richard Henderson
rth@cygnus.com
Fri Nov 19 01:32:00 GMT 1999
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 01:42:26AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Now for neg and abs operations.
> I am doing that only for -ffast-math. Is that safe by default?
Yes. Neither are required to be `operations' in the IEEE sense.
It is quite normal for neither to trap.
> + [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=f#rm,rmf")
Same comment about #f in alternative 1.
> + [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "register_operand" "")
> + (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand" "")))]
> + "TARGET_80387 && flag_fast_math && reload_completed
> + && !FP_REGNO_P (REGNO (operands[0]))"
> + [(parallel [(set (match_dup 0) (xor:SI (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1)))
> + (clobber (reg:CC 17))])]
You've just introduced a new clobber of the flags, with
no assurances that the register is not live.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list