[patch for libg++] Re: 1990314 fails to build
Alexandre Oliva
oliva@dcc.unicamp.br
Wed Mar 31 18:59:00 GMT 1999
On Mar 17, 1999, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br> wrote:
> On Mar 17, 1999, Manfred Hollstein <manfred@s-direktnet.de> wrote:
>> Could it probably be caused by the recent activation of fast-fixincludes?
> I've just checked out the previous snapshot and rebuilt it, and found
> the attached differences between the `include' directories created in
> their build trees.
Just in case someone is interested in the full differences between the
work of the slow fixinc and fast-fixinc, the first attachment contains
the fixes applied by the slow fixinc that are missing in fast-fixinc,
and the second one contains the fixes applied by fast-fixinc that were
not present in slow fixinc.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva aoliva@{acm.org,computer.org}
oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org}
Instituto de Computação, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil
*** E-mail about software projects will be forwarded to mailing lists
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: missing-fixes.diff.bz2
Type: application/x-bzip2
Size: 15496 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/19990331/5466b772/attachment.bz2>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: new-fixes.diff.bz2
Type: application/x-bzip2
Size: 1062 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/19990331/5466b772/attachment-0001.bz2>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list