g++ memory bug.

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Wed Mar 31 18:59:00 GMT 1999


  In message < 19990322155939.27838.qmail@deer >you write:
  > As long as the word "insn" is defined as "whatever gcc decides it means
  > in any given release".  Otherwise some people will think it means
  > assembly instructions, others the current gcc concept of an "insn", etc.
Yes, we definitely need to make the "insn" vs "instruction"
differences a little clearer.

jeff



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list