error_marks in expand_expr

Jeffrey A Law law@hurl.cygnus.com
Wed Mar 31 18:59:00 GMT 1999


  In message < 199903170051.BAA11967@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de >you write:
  > This function is way too large ... 
I haven't followed this discussion -- but I will certainly agree that
expand_expr is far larger than is wise.


jeff



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list