Patch to remove re-assert warnings on powerpc-*-linux-*

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Sat Mar 27 13:27:00 GMT 1999


> >On Sat, Mar 27, 1999 at 11:03:50AM -0500, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> >> On Sat, 27 Mar 1999 00:26:41 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >> >This patch removes "system(unix) re-asserted" type warnings from
> >> >powerpc-*-linux-*, which cpplib now produces and cause all the excess error
> >> >tests in testsuite to fail with --enable-c-cpplib.
> >> 
> >> I think you can safely delete all references to CPP_OS_LINUX_SPEC.
> >> CPP_PREDEFINES is a much better place to do this sort of thing, if
> >> only because it gets the test for defining bare `unix' right.


Along a related note:

I see that the -Asystem(unix) for i386 linux has been removed, and I
don't see the -Asystem(linux) having been there for a while.  Should
powerpc-linux lose these?  Similarly should we gain -Asystem(posix)?

Once that gets cleared up I'll take Zack's suggestion and submit a
patch to get rid of CPP_OS_LINUX_SPEC (more likely reduce it to "",
since I don't want to mess with the AIX specs more than I have to,
seeing as I can't do an AIX bootstrap).


Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|     CMU, CS class of 2002      |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __   Part-Time Systems Programmer  |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |        drow@cs.cmu.edu         |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list