(Really, summarizing remaining warnings)

Jeffrey A Law law@hurl.cygnus.com
Thu Mar 11 10:26:00 GMT 1999


  In message < 19990311115055.A1570@rjlhome.sco.com >you write:
  > > 1.  ~100 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
  > > 	I would welcome volunteers for 1 and 3.  
  > 
  > Do we think these are now all "real" and not just GCC being unable
  > to see that it's untrue?
It's a mixed bag.  When I wandered through the chill subdir fixing these
it was a little of both.  Similarly as I've picked off singletons in the
toplevel target/language independent code.

jeff


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list