(Really, summarizing remaining warnings)
Jeffrey A Law
law@hurl.cygnus.com
Thu Mar 11 10:26:00 GMT 1999
In message < 19990311115055.A1570@rjlhome.sco.com >you write:
> > 1. ~100 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
> > I would welcome volunteers for 1 and 3.
>
> Do we think these are now all "real" and not just GCC being unable
> to see that it's untrue?
It's a mixed bag. When I wandered through the chill subdir fixing these
it was a little of both. Similarly as I've picked off singletons in the
toplevel target/language independent code.
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list