Your proposed change to loop.c
Wed Jun 30 23:15:00 GMT 1999
>>>>> "Joern" == Joern Rennecke <email@example.com> writes:
Joern> No. Getting into any more detail would mean making a
Joern> patch, but I don't have any spare CPU cycles now to test
Since you're unable to help out at the moment, I've backed out the
changes that are causing the trouble. I bet they fix bugs and provide
real improvements, so I hope that you'll take the time to explain them
to someone so that they can go back in. I'll be happy to help with
that if I can.
I note that those patches were not accompanied by either commentary or
test-cases in the mail messages you sent when you checked them in, so
it's hard to figure out what they were for. I suggest resubmitting
them, in well-tested chunks, with some explanation.
I've verified that the mainline tree returns to bootstrap-ville with
these patches out.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
Thu Jun 24 15:00:47 1999 Mark Mitchell <email@example.com>
Revert these two patches:
Thu Jun 17 21:34:24 1999 J"orn Rennecke <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* loop.c (strength_reduce): When doing biv->giv conversion, update
reg note of NEXT->insn.
Thu Jun 17 17:22:07 1999 J"orn Rennecke <email@example.com>
* loop.c (strength_reduce): When doing biv->giv conversion, fix up
(recombine_givs): Set ix field after sorting.
More information about the Gcc-patches