egcs 2.91.66 ix86 problems...
Cristian Gafton
gafton@redhat.com
Thu Jun 24 11:52:00 GMT 1999
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > > A common sense rule says that using -mcpu=i486 should *not* define
> > > __i486__, because we don't want to use i486 specific code, we are only
> > > interested in the scheduler modifications.
> >
> > I second the motion that this is a bug in gcc. Any one else?
> Well, the other interpretation is that those defines can be used by the
> user to select one of N code sequences which work across the various
> machines.
You are saying here about machine code differences, and this is not what
-mcpu=i486 is documented to do.
> Really we need *two* flags, one pass along the -marh= and another to pass
> along -mcpu= as defines the user can check. That removes the ambiguity
> we currently have.
That would be great as well. Any chance of getting some of this fixed?
Thanks,
Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton -- gafton@redhat.com -- Red Hat, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list