EGCS: pointer to member functions.

Alexandre Oliva
Tue Jun 22 23:14:00 GMT 1999

On Jun 22, 1999, Jason Merrill <> wrote:

> I'm really don't think this change is a good idea; going through a thunk
> costs more than a simple test.  With branch prediction, the cost of the
> test is about zero, while the thunk adds an extra jump.

But the thunk would only be used for
pointer-to-virtual-member-function.  With the current code, users are
paying the price of an additional test and branch even when they only
use pointer-to-non-virtual-member-function.

Moreover, even if the test cost is close to zero, it would still have
to branch, and, given that the `thunk' I have in mind is as simple as
a `trampoline', I don't see how it could be less efficient than the
current approach.  Only if branches with good prediction were much
cheaper than a 100% certain jump; is this the case?

Alexandre Oliva IC-Unicamp, Bra[sz]il
{oliva,Alexandre.Oliva}  aoliva@{,}
*** E-mail about software projects will be forwarded to mailing lists

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list