range of enums

Jason Merrill jason@cygnus.com
Sun Feb 28 18:15:00 GMT 1999

>>>>> Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin@cygnus.com> writes:

 > Branko Cibej <branko.cibej@hermes.si>:
 >> The C++ standard says something else; ...

 > Well I stand by my interpretation of the C++ standard, but in any
 > case my patch doesn't change g++.

Note that g++ already deals with this by using fixup_{un,}signed_type to


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list