PIC patches for libio, libiberty, libstdc++

Jeffrey A Law law@hurl.cygnus.com
Thu Feb 18 10:41:00 GMT 1999


  In message < 4.1.19990218125519.03656150@mail.lauterbach.com >you write:
  > At 12:13 18.02.99 , Richard Earnshaw wrote:
  > >
  > >philb@gnu.org said:
  > >>  if [ "${shared}" = "yes" ]; then
  > >>    case "${target}" in
  > >> +    arm*-*) frags="${frags} ../../config/mh-armpic" ;;
  > >>      hppa*-*-*)		frags=../../config/mh-papic ;; 
  > >
  > >This isn't a proper canonical triplet.  It should either be arm-*-* or 
  > >arm*-*-*.  I suspect the latter.
  > 
  > Hmm, before these tables get extended even more, would someone look at my
  > patch http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-patches/1999-Jan/0635.html ?
  > It is meant to unify/simplify the fragment handling, it just needs some
  > testing. In the meantime I found one minor bug in my patch, in
  > libiberty/config.table it should be:
  >   frags="${frags} ../mh-frag"
  > instead of:
  >   frags="${frags} $r/mh-frag"
I looked at it, but it didn't seem right to me, particularly in the presense of
multiple fragment files.  But I couldn't convince myself either way.  SO I
tabled it until I could look at it more closely.


jeff


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list