combiner bug
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Fri Dec 31 16:38:00 GMT 1999
In message < 9912011023.AA03539@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu >you write:
> I'm not real familiar with this code, but this might be the fix. Basic
> ally
> we can't assume the result of a (eq/ne (blah) (const_int 0)) will have
> the value 0 or 1. It will have the value 0 or STORE_FLAG_VALUE (aka
> const_true_rtx).
>
> Yes, of course your change is correct. I don't know what I was thinking
> when I wrote that!
It's fairly easy to miss and doesn't effect ports that are built regularly,
but boy it hosed the m68k ;-)
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list