combiner bug

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Fri Dec 31 16:38:00 GMT 1999


  In message < 9912011023.AA03539@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu >you write:
  >     I'm not real familiar with this code, but this might be the fix.  Basic
  > ally
  >     we can't assume the result of a (eq/ne (blah) (const_int 0)) will have
  >     the value 0 or 1.  It will have the value 0 or STORE_FLAG_VALUE (aka
  >     const_true_rtx).
  > 
  > Yes, of course your change is correct.  I don't know what I was thinking
  > when I wrote that!
It's fairly easy to miss and doesn't effect ports that are built regularly,
but boy it hosed the m68k ;-)
jeff



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list