[PATCH] Sparc floating point optimizations

[Richard Henderson]

On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 12:50:41AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> I don't understand how this is what one would want.  I want this to
> match (ignoring alternative choice issues for a moment) even when !
> TARGET_VIS because the "st %g0" alternative is valid even in such a
> case.

I don't know how to explain it any clearer.  Perhaps if you
went and looked at movsf-4 through movsf-1 for alpha you'll
understand what I want.


r~