Jeffrey A Law
Tue Aug 31 22:41:00 GMT 1999
In message < 19990803120721.A28144@cygnus.com >you write:
> Well, that's the thing I'm not completely positive about. It could be that
> that patch gets us into trouble in some situation I'm not considering at th
> moment. If that's shown (or thought) to be the case, the patch should be
> re-done to special case the frame pointer.
I haven't been able to come up with one... The most obvious areas to worry
about would be weird varargs/stdarg stuff, structure return addresses which
get passed around in extra registers and the like.
Hmmm, there may be an issue with the PA64 ABI with its somewhat weird
of having the caller pass a pointer to the arglist to the callee. But I
really thought it through yet.
More information about the Gcc-patches