New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...)
Mumit Khan
khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU
Tue Aug 31 22:41:00 GMT 1999
Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> writes:
>
> Actually, RTTI is currently at indices 0 and 1. It will probably make
> sense to move them to negative offsets in the new model, since COM wants
> the functions to start at offset 0.
Makes very good sense. It really would stink to have to disable RTTI when
using COM and its variants.
Regards,
Mumit
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list