Another g77 parallel make patch
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Tue Aug 31 22:41:00 GMT 1999
In message < 19990806174530.1895.qmail@deer >you write:
> >Wed Aug 4 23:52:56 1999 H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
> >
> > * Make-lang.in; Use a unique stamp for each target to support
> > parallel make.
>
> Looks like the right idea. I have two concerns. One is, suffixes like
> .com have meanings on some systems, so maybe better names (than lang-f77
> even) should be considered.
I've got no significant opinion here.
> Two is, maybe all this can go away now, if LANGUAGES is dead (dunno about
> that) in favor of configure-time --enable-languages.
Yes. LANGUAGES is all-but-dead and should be completely dead as part of
the make/configure cleanup. The way we disable language specific
directories is via the --enable-languages="x,y,z" scheme. If a language is
left out of that list it will not be configured in any way shape or form
(and thus none of its fragments will end up in gcc/Makefile).
With that in mind I think we should proceed to kill the LANGUAGES tests
in f/Make* [and anywhere else they have managed to creep in]
> (I always felt the code you were patching, which I wrote, was really some
> sort of kludge to paper over some larger problems, which maybe don't exist
> anymore. But I haven't looked into that area of things recently.)
To some extent, yes.
jeff
"
>
> tq vm, (burley)
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list