Patches to the FAQ and the fatal error messages for guiding bug-reports better

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Wed Sep 16 00:31:00 GMT 1998


  In message < 35FE241E.599F7A72@markmitchell.com >you write:
  > > We could declare the new start/continuation scheme as the way to
  > > deal with all new warnings, then go back and deal with the old ones
  > > once we've made some long term decisions re: gcc2.  Not optimal, maybe
  > > not worth the effort.
  > 
  > I think this is the right thing to do.  It will give us a chance to 
  > nail the interface down by experimenting with new messages; we can then
  > convert the rest of the compiler when appropriate.
OK.  Then let's do this.

Note Cygnus is in the middle of EOQ madness right now, and I'm basically
unavailable next week as I'm in Japan on business.  So if you come up
with something during that time frame and submit it, I won't be around
to look at it.  Hopefully some of the other maintainers will fill in
as best they can.

Thanks,
jeff



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list