i386 attribute memory bug

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Wed Oct 28 00:10:00 GMT 1998


  In message < 19981028000617.A28930@dot.cygnus.com >you write:
  > On Wed, Oct 28, 1998 at 12:26:20AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
  > > How about fixing return_internal instead to specify "other" instead of
  > > changing the default for everything.
  > 
  > And how many other instructions are similarly mis-labeled? 
  > I guarantee that number is non-zero.
  > 
  > The only correct thing to do is to go through each of the 
  > instructions that ought to be "integer" and so mark them.
  > But that is outside the scope of this patch.
I'd much rather see you find the other cases and fix them instead of just
taking the approach you've taken.  I'll even help.  i386.md has 7653 lines.

I'll take the first 4k if you take the remainder.  It's not all that hard
since the only ones that can give us trouble are insns with one operand or
no operands if I understood your original message correctly.




jeff



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list