3rd PATCH to pre-select languages to be built
Jeffrey A Law
Sun Oct 25 12:16:00 GMT 1998
In message < firstname.lastname@example.org >you write:
> I haven't followed this previously and I'm not sure why it's necessary
> to configure different Makefiles, but surely it's wrong to make empty
> ones since things like `make distclean' won't work?
An empty makefile is definitely wrong.
> [In case it's relevant and not clear, libf2c doesn't currently require
> the fortran compiler to build it, but might in the future -- some of
> it was actually written in fortran and f2c'd.]
True, but I don't see the point behind building it if you haven't build the
Yes, there are a few situations where hackers/develers will want to do this.
I don't mind making them go through an extra step if it makes life easier on
the rest of our users :-)
More information about the Gcc-patches