Patch to warn about non-static declaration follows static one

Jason Merrill jason@cygnus.com
Thu Oct 22 17:58:00 GMT 1998


>>>>> Kaveh R Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:

 > 	Although it is perhaps legal, a non-static decl following a
 > static one isn't portable.

How so?  The later decl inherits the linkage of the earlier, or at at least
it does in C++.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list