eb fix 1
Robert Lipe
robertl@dgii.com
Thu May 28 23:08:00 GMT 1998
Martin von Loewis wrote:
> This code is in error, and egcs detects that.
> We might want to remove it.
We need to pick a direction on what we want to do with those.
But are you sure about this patch? It generates a different error for
me. Are you perhaps running something other than what's checked in? :-)
/net/rjlhome/home/play/egcs/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb118.C:17: e
xplicit specialization not preceded by `template <>'
/net/rjlhome/home/play/egcs/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb118.C:21: e
xplicit specialization not preceded by `template <>'
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb118.C not a specialization (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb118.C not a specialization (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb118.C (test for excess errors)
>
> Martin
>
>
> Index: eb118.C
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /egcs/carton/cvsfiles/egcs/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb118.C,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -c -p -r1.1 eb118.C
> *** eb118.C 1998/05/27 23:00:35 1.1
> --- eb118.C 1998/05/28 19:13:56
> *************** A<T>::test(){
> *** 13,23 ****
> cerr << "test for " << typeid(*this).name() << endl;
> }
> // Specialization declaration
> ! void
> A<double>::test();
>
> // Specialization definition
> ! void
> A<double>::test(){ // ============= LINE 21 ==================
> cerr << "specialization for " << typeid(*this).name() << endl;
> }
> --- 13,23 ----
> cerr << "test for " << typeid(*this).name() << endl;
> }
> // Specialization declaration
> ! void // ERROR - not a specialization
> A<double>::test();
>
> // Specialization definition
> ! void // ERROR - not a specialization
> A<double>::test(){ // ============= LINE 21 ==================
> cerr << "specialization for " << typeid(*this).name() << endl;
> }
--
Robert Lipe http://www.dgii.com/people/robertl robertl@dgii.com
(WEB ADDRESS MAY BE TEMPORARILY UNAVAILABLE)
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list