fix for libf2c installation

Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de
Tue Jun 23 01:30:00 GMT 1998


On Mon, 22 June 1998, 23:53:43, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:

 >   > Manfred, does this make sense?  Could you consider doing it if you
 >   > understand the relevant bits of top-level configure?  Feel free
 >   > to fix up the gcc, g77, and libf2c configure/Makefile stuff accordingly
 >   > (e.g. the gcc configure would have to substitute the $(libsubdir)
 >   > macro as well in the gcc Makefile it builds, right?).
 > Agreed.  Fixing it once and for all would be good :-)  The only thing
 > to be careful about would be setting "version" in a subdir that
 > has its own notion of version #s (libstdc++, or any non-egcs package
 > like binutils that someone might put in the egcs tree to set up a
 > single tree build environment).

Well, this is actually one of the next issues I thought of ;-) Once
I'll find some time, I'll send a patch for this.

BTW: nobody did comment about my `PATCH for new flag
     `--enable-libs-in-libsubdir' which I've sent last Saturday
     < http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-patches/1998-Jun/0430.html >;
     Jeff, what do you think, is it OK to give it a try?

manfred



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list