reload CSE optimization

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Tue Jun 9 22:50:00 GMT 1998


  In message < 19980609185308.A15842@dot.cygnus.com >you write:
  > On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:25:42PM -0400, John Carr wrote:
  > > 
  > > Reload CSE should not replace a CONST_INT with a REG unless the REG is
  > > cheaper.  If they are equal cost other considerations make the original
  > > form preferable (scheduling, human comprehension, and the principle that
  > > one should avoid making changes with no benefit).
  > 
  > There is an additional place this should be checked.
[ ... ]
This looks good too.

jeff



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list