Your change to jump.c breaks conditional move?

Jeffrey A Law
Thu Jun 4 23:23:00 GMT 1998

  In message < >you write:
  > On Thu, Jun 04, 1998 at 11:27:08AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
  > > I think either way we should handle it. We can put abort () there if
  > > we don't think it is very likely. Otherwise, we handle it like PLUS.
  > Ok, here is an alternate patch.  I also realized I should have
  > been checking the other side of the op for a symbol.
Actually, I don't think the check for SYMBOL_REF is sufficient.

The address could be a SYMBOL_REF, (CONST (PLUS (SYMBOL_REF) (CONST_INT)),

I'm also not sure checking for PLUS/MINUS is enough either since
some PIC implementations use LO_SUM instead of PLUS to add the 
pic register to the lower bits of a symbolic address.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list