PATCH for Re: more evidence that failing to detect ICE's is a significant problem
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Wed Aug 19 22:34:00 GMT 1998
In message < u93eas4lh6.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com >you write:
> Oops, I forgot to respond to this before. I don't think this patch is a
> good idea, as there's no way to set XFAIL for the ICE. I think the old way
> of considering an ICE to be a failure was fine. Sure, all crashes are
> bugs, but not necessarily worse bugs than others.
It had been sitting for a while, so I figured it was free game :-)
It sounds like you and Mark are still discussing if the patch should
stay or go. If y'all decide the patch should be reverted, then revert
it -- I've got no strong opinions either way.
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list