gcc bug? constinit does not require constexpr ctor

[Klaus Doldinger]

To answer my question myself: actually fixed in gcc-trunk.

Am 10.10.19 um 06:53 schrieb Klaus Doldinger:
> Hi all,
> 
> simple question: should in the following example the constinit case be
> also impossible if the required ctor is not constexpr?
> 
> struct B {
>     /*constexpr*/ B() {}
> };
> 
> struct A {
>     constexpr static inline B b2{}; // not possible
>     constinit static inline B b1{}; // should this NOT possible either?
> };
> 
> int main() {
>     A a;
> }
>