Recursive SIGSEGV question

Jonny Grant jg@jguk.org
Tue Mar 19 22:05:00 GMT 2019


Hello

Wanted to ask opinion about the following.

Compiling with g++ 8.2.0 and saw the following. The program was in a 
recursive function call (bug). My test case is attached, although could 
not reproduce exactly same backtrace.

I had a look at https://github.com/lattera/glibc/blob/master/malloc/malloc.c

Is there an issue in _int_malloc? or was it most likely just out of 
memory? Do out of memory issues normally show up as SIGSEGV? I had 
expected some sort of "out of memory"

This is the log from own software (not attached) :-

Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x00007faa0e37b30e in _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7fa980000020,
     bytes=bytes@entry=45) at malloc.c:3557
3557	malloc.c: No such file or directory.
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fa997860700 (LWP 20571))]
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007faa0e37b30e in _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7fa980000020,
     bytes=bytes@entry=45) at malloc.c:3557
#1  0x00007faa0e37e2ed in __GI___libc_malloc (bytes=45) at malloc.c:3065
#2  0x00007faa0eba21a8 in operator new(unsigned long) ()
    from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6



I tried to create a test case, but got slightly different messages, they 
actually vary. Is there a gdb bug if the same program has different 
backtraces?
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 8.1-0ubuntu3) 8.1.0.20180409-git

Core was generated by `./loop'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x00007fc10dee51e7 in void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, 
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> 
 >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) ()
    from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007fc10dee51e7 in void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, 
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> 
 >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) ()
    from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x00005592fbb669d7 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#2  0x00005592fbb669e8 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#3  0x00005592fbb669e8 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7



The backtrace seems to vary, is this possibly a GDB bug?


Core was generated by `./loop'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x00005615cc3549ae in func (
     f=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe87dfefd8>,
     g=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe87dfefd4>) at loop.cpp:6
6	{
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00005615cc3549ae in func (
     f=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe87dfefd8>,
     g=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe87dfefd4>) at loop.cpp:6
#1  0x00005615cc354a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#2  0x00005615cc354a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#3  0x00005615cc354a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#4  0x00005615cc354a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7



Core was generated by `./loop'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x0000559924c939ae in func (
     f=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe76f8bfe8>,
     g=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe76f8bfe4>) at loop.cpp:6
6	{
(gdb) bt
#0  0x0000559924c939ae in func (
     f=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe76f8bfe8>,
     g=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 
0x7ffe76f8bfe4>) at loop.cpp:6
#1  0x0000559924c93a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#2  0x0000559924c93a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#3  0x0000559924c93a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#4  0x0000559924c93a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#5  0x0000559924c93a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#6  0x0000559924c93a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7
#7  0x0000559924c93a03 in func (f="a", g=0) at loop.cpp:7

Jonny
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: loop.cpp
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/attachments/20190319/4ad37d6f/attachment.bin>


More information about the Gcc-help mailing list