Compiling GCC for different x86 CPU generation

[Andrew Haley]

On 07/24/2018 10:36 AM, Andrew Janke wrote:
> Am I reading this right that a MULX was the offending instruction? That 
> sounds right, since it was introduced in Haswell, and this is an older 
> Ivy Bridge machine.

Yep.  That's all you need to know.

> Unfortunately, the backtrace isn't giving me file names. I guess that's 
> because these files weren't compiled with debug symbol info (hence "no 
> debugging symbols found")?

That's right.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671