stage 1 bootstrap fail on Debian armv7
Dennis Clarke
dclarke@blastwave.org
Thu Dec 27 20:43:00 GMT 2018
On 12/27/18 3:22 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> I was surprised to see this sort of thing in stage 1 of a bootstrap
>> of gcc 8.2.0 where the local host gcc was 6.3.0-18+deb9u1 :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86724
>
>> Well that is interesting and perhaps I should try to not leap from 6.3.x
>> all the way to 8.2.0 ? I'll give 7.4.0 a shot but curious if anyone has
>> seen anything like the above.
>
> Please search bugzilla and try a fresh checkout of trunk (or
> gcc-8-branch) to see if things are already known.
>
right right right ... this is all very familiar now .. dumb me ...
I should have checked my own notes from months ago when I ran into this
exact issue :
beta $ diff -c ./gcc/graphite.h_bugid_86724 ./gcc/graphite.h
*** ./gcc/graphite.h_bugid_86724 Wed Jan 3 10:03:58 2018
--- ./gcc/graphite.h Fri Oct 19 18:51:27 2018
***************
*** 37,42 ****
--- 37,44 ----
#include <isl/schedule.h>
#include <isl/ast_build.h>
#include <isl/schedule_node.h>
+ #include <isl/id.h>
+ #include <isl/space.h>
typedef struct poly_dr *poly_dr_p;
see https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org/msg581075.html
Okeee dookee ... easy fix.
Thanks for that and I'll go back to watching this little arm7 ASUS
TinkerBoard baking its little rockchip to 48C.
Dennis
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list