asm volatile statement reordering

[Toebs Douglass]

On 17/10/17 08:58, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 17/10/17 08:32, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> GCC guesses wrong on occasion. It will remove code that has value that
>> but does not produce an output because the language does not allow us
>> to express it.
>>
>> The C language lacks what we need to express what we need to do. Its a
>> failure of the C (and C++) committees. Its not a GCC failure.
> 
> I disagree.  If you want a bunch of asms to execute in a particular
> order, add a memory clobber or some dependencies.  It's not difficult
> once you have the understanding.  In this particular case, fixing it
> is trivial, and there are many ways to do it.

This is true, but - although I could be wrong - I think these solutions 
are not part of the standards.  They are GCC specific.  Jeffrey was 
talking about the C/C++ standards.