ABI for C and C++ on x86

Jim Blandy jimb@red-bean.com
Thu Jan 7 01:18:00 GMT 2016


On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2) Is this choice documented somewhere authoritative? I expected the
>> LSB to be the authority here, but it a) seems to be being abandoned
>> (Debian backed away from it this September), and b) only
>> cites the SysV i386 supplement, which predates C99 and things like bool.
>
> The official psABI may not be current, but it's still maintained via
> an unofficial fork, see https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/wiki
> for links to more info.

Thanks very much. Does GCC have a policy of following this fork at present?



More information about the Gcc-help mailing list